Monday
Mar302009
Long / Short Sector ETF Strategy
Monday, March 30, 2009 at 11:21PM
Today I would
like to demonstrate a long/short sector ETF strategy
using the Portfolio123 ETF screen backtest tool.

I am going to give a little "teaser" tonight. It isn't a fully developed system at present but demonstratess the potential of a hedged strategy using both long and short sector ETFs (leveraged and normal). First I defined a long ETF universe as follows:

Likewise a short ETF universe:


I am going to give a little "teaser" tonight. It isn't a fully developed system at present but demonstratess the potential of a hedged strategy using both long and short sector ETFs (leveraged and normal). First I defined a long ETF universe as follows:

Likewise a short ETF universe:

I am going to run
two backtests: (1) long sector ETFs; and (2) short sector
ETFs. First the long. Here is the screen setup. It is
quite similar to the screen in previous post but this time
the screen is looking for the ETF with the strongest
yearly rise in each sector.

And now for the results with two holdings rebalanced daily.

Results are not particularly good. The bottom line is that $100 was invested and at the end of one year the trading capital shrunk to $53.00 (including slippage). Now let's see the short ETF screen.

The results for the short backtest. Again the portfolio is
rebalanced daily while holding two ETFs.

Now you can see that the results are quite volatile. This
is a result of combined use of leveraged ETFs with a long
term rule (Close(0)/Close(250)) with short term violent
swings. But the bottom line is that the end value of the
Short ETF backtest was $215.1, starting from $100 one year
earlier. If an investor put equal dollars into each
strategy, he/she would start with ($100 + $100) = $200. At
the end of one year the investor would have ($53.00 +
$215.10) = $268.10. This amounts to a 34% profit over one
year. This is a very simple analysis and I hope to expand
on this in future posts. I also expect that results can be
improved with more sophisticated ranking systems (this
feature now available with Portfolio123). I should point
out that this strategy works with 2 long and 2 short
holdings. But results are not good with larger number of
ETFs.
Steve

And now for the results with two holdings rebalanced daily.

Results are not particularly good. The bottom line is that $100 was invested and at the end of one year the trading capital shrunk to $53.00 (including slippage). Now let's see the short ETF screen.


Steve





Reader Comments (7)
Long-short is the way to go in this environment. I am researching long/short stock systems but for the average investor long/short is best done with ETFs. There is a lot of good work being done on the Motley Fool's mechanical investing forum related to a momentum based system called 'Riding the Wave'. I haven't gotten deep into the P123 ETF functionality yet and thank you for getting me interested.
Shaun - is there a link you can point me to on Motley fool? When I did a search I came up with all sorts of stuff but no mechanical rules...
Steve
Steve, searchfor "Riding the Wave" on the MF Mechanical Investing forum. The key person behind this strategy is is Zeelotes. He gave an overview here: http://tinyurl.com/ccnu66 . Basically, it's a ranking of ETFs based on two moving averages (50 & 235 days in the initial formulation).
Zee had kept a blog at: http://www.zeelotes.org/blog/, complete with downloadable spreadsheets, but it appears that he has stripped it of all content.
I have developed a fancy spreadsheet that implements RTW with a bunch of bells and whistles that were not in the original. [I've mentioned it to you before.] Here's the history starting with $100,000 on 1/1/04 (no friction):
Portval 517,426
CAGR 36.5 %
DDMax 30.8 %
DDAvg 8.3 %
DDRecovery 101 days (time to recover from average drawdown at a rate CAGR
Trades 34
of which 53 % Profitable
AvgHold 57 days
Turnover 6.4 times/year
Jerrod - what's the average profit per trade for your version?
Steve
Arithmetic average = ( EndValue / BeginValue) ^ (1/Trades) - 1
= (5.174)^(1/34) - 1 = 4.95%
A minor tweak in the model parameters gives virtually the same CAGR, but with only 25 trades (at the expense of somewhat worse DD stats). IN that case,
= (5.161) ^ (1/25) - 1 = 6.78%
BTW, there is a wonderful search engine for the Motley Fool Mechanical Investing forum:
http://www.datahelper.com/mi/search.phtml